In the huge perspective of academic publishing, researchers try to proportion their findings with their arena. However, not all journals now uphold the rigorous standards to ensure published research’s integrity and superiority. One predatory journal lately under scrutiny is the International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews (IJRPR).
Journal Website: https://www.ijrpr.com/
Alarming Findings
A thorough examination of IJRPR revealed disturbing trends in the articles published. These results are summed up in the data below:
- High Levels of Plagiarism: Many articles displayed as much as 75% plagiarism, indicating a massive section of the content got copied from different resources without proper attribution.
- AI-Generated Content: Some articles were 100% AI-generated, raising questions about the authenticity and originality of the studies being published.
These findings are deeply concerning and suggest that IJRPR might not adhere to the ethical standards expected of reputable academic journals.
| Article Title | AI Detection % | Plagiarism % | Download Proof |
| Emotion-Based Music Recommendation Systems: Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced Personalization | 84% | – | Download |
| Hand Gesture Recognition for Games | 99% | – | Download |
| Bank Loan Prediction Using Machine Learning | 70% | 41% | Download Download |
| SafeDrive: (Face Recognition System for Smart Vehicles) | 100% | – | Download |
| Exploring Nature’s Remedies: The Soothing Effects of Chamomile and Calendula Extracts in Herbal Cold Creams for Alleviating Skin Irritation | 51% | 47% | Download Download |
| A Comparative Analysis of Stress, Depression, and Trait Anxiety in Women with PCOD and Healthy Controls | 58% | – | Download Download |
| Medical Image Synthesis Using Deep Learning | 73% | 40% | Download |
| Review on Wireless Electrical Vehicle Charging System | 58% | – | Download |
| AI-Driven Decision-Making: Insights and Impacts on Digital Transformation in Business | 72% | – | Download |
| Self-Centering Seismic Resistant Structures | 58% | – | Download |
| Recent Advances in Large Language Models: An Upshot | 82% | – | Download |
| A Study on Lean Manufacturing Principles to Enhance Production Efficiency | – | 46% | Download |
| Culture of Tribal People of Jharkhand: An Overview | 99% | – | Download |
| Tour Guidance System Using Android Studio | – | 46% | Download |
| Rice Quality Prediction Using Deep Learning | 100% | – | Download |
| A Comprehensive Survey on Analyzing Social Media Data for User Behavior Prediction Using Graph Neural Networks | 100% | 29% | Download Download |
| A Study on Employee Perception Towards Environmental Management System with Special Reference to Saravana Global Energy Ltd. | – | 37% | Download |
| A Study on Manpower Training and Development as a Tool for Enhancing Employee Performance | – | 41% | Download |
| Effect of Tabata Training on Selected Bio-Motor Components Among College Men Basketball Players | – | 75% | Download |
| Factors Affecting Buying Decision of Milk Tea Consumers | 57% | – | Download |
We have checked many IJRPR articles in Turnitin, and the similarity scores have been growing considerably, causing our costs to develop notably in the course of this investigation.
The Risks of Publishing in Predatory Journals like IJRPR
Publishing in predatory journals like IJRPR will have severe effects on researchers. The following are some of the top threats:
1. Damage to Reputation
- Impact: The incorporation with a predatory journal could damage a researcher’s reputation. It can lead to doubt about the quality and originality of their work, affecting their credibility in the academic community.
2. Lack of Peer Review
- Impact: Predatory publications usually skip rigorous peer review processes for their articles. This concludes with a circulation of unsupervised and probably wrong studies, decreasing the general excellence of scientific literature.
4. Limited Visibility and Impact
- Impact: Predatory journals are rarely listed in respected academic databases, meaning that the research published in them might not reach a huge audience. This limits the effect and citation capability of the articles.
5. Legal and Ethical Issues
- Impact: Publishing in journals that do not adhere to ethical guidance can result in legal and ethical issues, including capacity retraction of articles, which could further damage a researcher’s profession.
Steps to Protect Yourself
To avoid falling prey to predatory journals such as IJRPR, researchers should take the following precautions:
| Precaution | Description |
| Check the Editorial Board | Investigate the credentials and affiliations of the editorial board members. |
| Verify Indexing | Ensure the journal is indexed in respected databases such as Scopus or Web of Science. |
| Review Publication Policies | Look for clear policies on plagiarism, peer review, and publication ethics. |
| Read Reviews and Reports | Look for reviews or reports about the journal from other researchers. |
| Assess Article Quality | Examine previously published articles for quality and relevance. |
Raising Awareness
Raising awareness of the threats created by predatory journals is necessary. The academic community can protect researchers especially those in their early careers from these pitfalls by exchanging information and research findings. Protecting defensive researchers from exploitation and maintaining the integrity of educational publishing depends on increasing awareness of predatory journals. The following are extra ideas and actions to help raise awareness:
1. Educational Workshops and Seminars
- Description: Prepare conferences and workshops to inform researchers—especially graduate students and early-career scholars about the warning signs of predatory journals and how to spot them.
- Impact: These gatherings can raise awareness and offer helpful advice, assisting researchers in choosing journals for their work’s publication.
2. Institutional Policies and Guidelines
- Description: Encourage universities and research facilities to create and implement procedures that guide researchers in selecting reputable journals. Lists of recommended journals and people to stay away from can be part of this.
- Impact: Clear institutional guidelines can provide researchers with the resources they need to avoid predatory journals and ensure the quality and credibility of their publications.
3. Publication of Case Studies
- Description: Publish and share case studies that highlight instances where researchers have been negatively impacted by publishing in predatory journals. These real-life examples can be powerful in conveying the risks involved.
- Impact: Case studies can function as instructive testimonies, showing the ability consequences of compelling predatory publishers and motivating researchers to be extra careful.
4. Online Resources and Checklists
- Description: Create and disseminate online sources, along with checklists and publications, to help researchers evaluate journals. These sources may be hosted on academic websites or institutional repositories.
- Impact: Easy access to comprehensive and person-friendly sources can empower researchers to conduct thorough controls before submitting their manuscripts.
5. Engagement with Academic Societies
- Description: Collaborate with academic societies and expert groups to promote attention to predatory journals. These bodies can leverage their networks to unfold the message broadly.
- Impact: Academic societies can effectively disseminate information to a large number of researchers, ensuring that a large number of researchers are aware of the issue.
6. Promotion of Transparent Journal Metrics
- Description: Advocate for using transparent and reliable journal metrics, together with the Journal Impact Factor, h-index, and others, to assess the credibility of journals. Encourage journals to be transparent approximately their evaluation strategies and editorial requirements.
- Impact: Researchers can decrease their risk of becoming victims of predatory journals by making more informed decisions about where to publish when they have access to transparent and trustworthy metrics.
7. Peer Support Networks
- Description: Encourage the formation of peer support networks wherein researchers can share their reports and recommendations concerning journal selection. Online forums, social media groups, and educational networks can serve as structures for those discussions.
- Impact: Peer networks can offer treasured insights and aid, assisting researchers navigate the complex panorama of academic publishing.
8. Utilization of Technology
- Description: Promote the use of equipment and technology, together with AI-based journal evaluation platforms and plagiarism detection software, to assist researchers evaluate the credibility of journals and the originality of their work.
- Impact: Researchers can improve their ability to spot predatory journals and make sure their work complies with strict ethical guidelines by utilizing technology.
By making these changes, the academic community as a whole can reduce the impact of predatory publications and promote a history of moral and excellent research guidance.
Conclusion
The discovery of too many plagiarism levels and AI-generated content stuff in articles from IJRPR highlights the significance of surveillance in academic publishing. Researchers have to be careful and behavior through exams before submitting their work to any journal. By staying knowledgeable and intelligent, we will maintain the integrity and first-class of scholarly communication.